From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.d,...,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Priceless...
Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2005 21:38:26 -0400
Message-ID: <MPG.1d17ff1913eecff6989744@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
I am not a pedophile and you're wrong. It is possible for an 8 year old to have the sex drive but typically it begins around the age of
10 or 11.
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.d,alt.2600.warez,...
Subject: Re: ATTN:
Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2005 00:43:20 -0400
Message-ID: <MPG.1d1d706417c4d7e7989769@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
A person who has pedophilic impulses but has never acted on them is not a pedophile.
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.2000s,...
Subject: Re: NOT TIME TO SKIN A GIRAFFE.
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 00:55:25 -0500
Message-ID: <MPG.1e0d725c715a42be9897a9@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
A person who suffers from pedophilic impulses is not a pedophile.
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: Understanding the Buidling of a FAQ.
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 21:28:29 GMT
Message-ID: <10tJ9.196682$ka.4628233@news1.calgary.shaw.ca>
If they want to write little fantasy stories of incest and kiddie sex I dont care, it's harmless.
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: non-warez related musing (akula: don't read)
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2004 20:42:43 -0500
Message-ID: <MPG.1bff309f63a296ba989846@newz.spoofed.info>
Since the 8 year old boy was not forced and the boy was the person who in this case wanted it, he was not raped. It isn't molestation and
it isn't rape. You can ask everyone including the police.
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,...,alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: abwi0: Diskeeper.v9.0.532.All.Versions.Retail-SUN
Date: Sun, 20 Nov 2005 04:28:25 GMT
Message-ID: <MPG.1dea0c1ea41a49ec98968d@news.asskicker.ca>
When I brought this up to you before, you screamed "CONSENT" and you started ranting about consent laws.. THE BOY DOES NOT KNOW
ABOUT CONSENT LAWS. It is the LAW which says that he has no legal right to consent. The boy can still consent whether he knows it
is legally right or not for him to be doing so, you idiot.
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.argus,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,...
Subject: Re: abwi0: Diskeeper.v9.0.532.All.Versions.Retail-SUN
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 00:22:27 GMT
Message-ID: <MPG.1df1bb90cf0077959896bd@news.asskicker.ca>
When it states they are *incapable* of giving consent it applies to the youth, is means the child is too young to speak such as a toodler or
baby.
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,...,alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.nospam
Subject: Re: Nero copying problem
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 22:27:19 -0400
Message-ID: <MPG.1d1021746b7f8a6c989702@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
If the 8 year old boy is willing it is not rape. You claimed it is RAPE on the part of the 29 year-old. In fact you claim it is
statutory rape. You claim it is "Molestation" on the part of the 29 year-old. I have, since day one stated it was not rape
and it was not molestation because the _boy_ wanted it.
BTW, What the 29 year-old did
was also not statutory rape. I don't care if you believe that what she did was statutory rape, but this isn't the case nor are you correct in
your claim.
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Zeke and Mjølnër Bitch slapped Dougie again
Date: Fri, 1 Dec 2006 00:42:07 -0500
Message-ID: <MPG.1fd98aabb0ad1943989695@newz.skilled.net>
I do not condone what the teacher had done, but I do disagree on "it" being called RAPE when the boy was a willing partner. As
to your claim I am wrong about it not being rape, I guess that is one of many things that we will never agree on.
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.d
Subject: Re: NOT TIME TO SKIN A GIRAFFE.
Date: Sat, 17 Dec 2005 21:53:14 -0500
Message-ID: <MPG.1e0e9929ebca39689897ba@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
He feels, and he thinks he speaks for everyone, that a child can't make a decision because the law says the child is not mature enough to make
informed decisions. That a child is incapable of saying "yes" because the law says the child cannot make informed decisions.
That is what he is claiming. The guy is sooo dense.
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.d,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.argus
Subject: Re: [POLL] Is your child capable of saying yes.
Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2005 22:45:57 -0500
Message-ID: <MPG.1e0ff6e88ba44632989680@news.pearlgates.org>
You know damn well a child is capable of agreeing to whatever proposal brought in front of him/her and it is the law which says their agreement
isn't worth the sound made. That is the difference here. No one can say that a child cannot agree to something they can only claim a
child under the age of consent is not legally capable of doing it.
All this time we (those are the people you call "pedos") have been saying that a child can give consent but it is the law which says
they are no legally able to. A child can and is capable of making a decision whether or not the law states the child is old enough to make
an informed decision. Only tards like you claim that children are incapable of agreement, legally or otherwise.
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.argus,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,...,alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: abwi0: Diskeeper.v9.0.532.All.Versions.Retail-SUN
Date: Sat, 26 Nov 2005 02:47:50 GMT
Message-ID: <MPG.1df1dd2a5f55256c9896c6@news.asskicker.ca>
If a 29 year old had willing sexual intercouse with a 8 year old boy it wouldn't be any different than a 15 year old having sex with a 12 year
old girl. Since the boy was _WILLING_ and he _WAS NOT FORCED_ and it was NOT against his will and he was CAPABLE of consenting he could
and did consent.
Now you've been schooled. Run along, chump!
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.argus,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,...
Subject: Re: abwi0: Diskeeper.v9.0.532.All.Versions.Retail-SUN
Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 21:57:24 GMT
Message-ID: <MPG.1df7eab2792585c89896cf@news.asskicker.ca>
8 year olds can consent to anything they want from chocolate milk to having sex.
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,...,alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.nospam
Subject: Re: Nero copying problem
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2005 00:33:28 -0400
Message-ID: <MPG.1d0eed9f3fdac55e9896f6@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
In the case of the 29 year-old having sex with a minor it *may* have been molestation on the part of the 29 year-old against the
8 year-old.
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.2600.warez,...,alt.argus
Subject: Re: ATTN Group: Nym change
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2005 19:45:29 -0500
Message-ID: <MPG.1ddc62325d699c069896a7@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
This post, Mugwamp <mugwamp@yer.door>
may be monitored for quality assurance:
>You claim it was not molestation.
Yes, and I reversed myself on that statement, learning that legally it is molestation to give a minor deep passionate kisses.
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Too many akulas
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2005 02:48:15 -0000
Message-ID: <MPG.1de4ae48e9985f109896e0@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
This post, Spnak-a-Lezzie <spnak@lezzie.c0m>
may be monitored for quality assurance:
>On Wed, 16 Nov 2005 00:44:34 -0000, Leslie "TheApostle" Paulin <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
wrote:
>
>> <laughs out loud> Nice to see you, Aubergine!
>
>Nice to see you rubbing elbows with an _ADMITTED_ member of Pedo University, Les.
At least he can admit being a member, Mjolner. <g> You on the other hand are too cowardly to admit your affiliations. Perhaps
we should ask our good friend Aubergine what exactly PEDO-U is? Sounds so sinister..
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: A lotta people hate TheApostle
Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 19:41:58 -0500
Message-ID: <MPG.1e45d96177003c3c989832@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
If the child consented but was under the age of consent (under 10 years old) the sentence in some states is more harsh, as opposed to a sentence
where the child is under the age of consent and above 10 years old.
Is a child legally able to consent to sex, no. Can a child consent to sex, yes.
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.argus
Subject: Re: Mjolner will be going away for a while
Date: Sat, 18 Mar 2006 16:46:34 -0500
Message-ID: <MPG.1e8649c2f62772d2989791@news.pearlgates.org>
This post, Mjølnër <mjolner@warezfaq.com>
may be monitored for quality assurance:
>Read some history, asshole. MOHAMMED DID IN FACT, AT THE AGE OF 53 TAKE 9 YEAR OLD AISHA TO HIS BED. Even the muslims
acknowledge that fact. It's part of their history. One they try to play-down, of course, but one they must acknowledge, nonetheless. The
reason I despise you and your ilk is your total lack of empathy. You find humor in the suffering of children.
Yes, he *took* which is different then *luring* a child. In fact he *took* his *wife* who he had married. A marraige at the time
which was blessed by the father of the child. There is a difference, you sack of shit.
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.2600.warez,...
Subject: Re: Leslie Paulin/TheApostle: Supporting Child Molestation And Rape
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 16:43:08 -0500
Message-ID: <MPG.1e503b7cc3816a40989862@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
You've still yet to show where the Bible frowns on pedophilia...if people were to look at the web site you provided for answers on that subject,
they would see you're wrong. Going to admit you're wrong?
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,alt.2600.warez
Subject: Re: London blasts
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2005 20:47:12 -0400
Message-ID: <MPG.1d4a0c1f51d33b4d98968f@news.r00ted.ca>
If you fantasize about having sex with children I don't believe that makes you a pedophile from what I have been taught and read. Children
have sex all the time, or are you completely oblivious to that fact? You didn't have sex as a child?
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d,...,soc.net-people
Subject: Re: My dear John
Date: Sun, 6 Nov 2005 19:21:10 -0500
Message-ID: <MPG.1dd868003030d7e8989682@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
What is the problem with finding some 15 or 16 years old attractive? Don't you think there are some pretty people in this world? Of course
you don't because those pretty people have to be legal age, right? Is it morally wrong to admire someone who is attrative dispite their
age? Here is a clue - not everyone is as ignorant as you are.
From: TheApostle <likes-to-fuck@mailme.org>
Newsgroups: alt.binaries.sounds.mp3.d,...,alt.binaries.warez.ibm-pc.d
Subject: Re: Priceless...
Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:36:07 -0400
Message-ID: <MPG.1d1917d6edfdea07989748@nnrp.mynews-ownsyou.com>
I cannot actually believe you would think that I am justifying pedophilia by stating that the sexual drive which is induced by testosterone in
humans is justification of having sex with children. Either you're really one backwards hick or you have the education of a
doorknob.
|
|
|
|
